<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9074529824943791718.post5665507421133343876..comments</id><updated>2010-02-10T16:48:32.084-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Comments on Soul Physics: Get Started Reading Recent Classics on the Philoso...</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.soulphysics.org/feeds/5665507421133343876/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9074529824943791718/5665507421133343876/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.soulphysics.org/2010/02/get-started-reading-recent-classics-on.html'/><author><name>Bryan</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07379669532781325751</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>5</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9074529824943791718.post-7332458857432206998</id><published>2010-02-10T16:48:32.084-05:00</published><updated>2010-02-10T16:48:32.084-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Sklar's book on the philosophy of statistical mech...</title><content type='html'>Sklar&amp;#39;s book on the philosophy of statistical mechanics (&amp;quot;Physics and Chance&amp;quot;) is absolutely essential for anyone considering work in that field. Liu and Emch&amp;#39;s &amp;quot;The Logic of Thermo-Statistical Physics&amp;quot; may not be well-known enough to qualify for &amp;quot;classic&amp;quot; status, but it is excellent.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9074529824943791718/5665507421133343876/comments/default/7332458857432206998'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9074529824943791718/5665507421133343876/comments/default/7332458857432206998'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.soulphysics.org/2010/02/get-started-reading-recent-classics-on.html?showComment=1265838512084#c7332458857432206998' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.soulphysics.org/2010/02/get-started-reading-recent-classics-on.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9074529824943791718.post-5665507421133343876' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9074529824943791718/posts/default/5665507421133343876' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9074529824943791718.post-2971125236121831707</id><published>2010-02-10T14:15:23.657-05:00</published><updated>2010-02-10T14:15:23.657-05:00</updated><title type='text'>I don't think Penrose should be on there.

Agree w...</title><content type='html'>I don&amp;#39;t think Penrose should be on there.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Agree with Jon about Price. Best philosophy of direction of time book out there, IMO.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Don&amp;#39;t know if it&amp;#39;s recent enough and no idea how it compares to Lange, but I remember Sklar&amp;#39;s &amp;quot;Philosophy of Physics&amp;quot; as being a pretty decent introduction to the field.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9074529824943791718/5665507421133343876/comments/default/2971125236121831707'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9074529824943791718/5665507421133343876/comments/default/2971125236121831707'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.soulphysics.org/2010/02/get-started-reading-recent-classics-on.html?showComment=1265829323657#c2971125236121831707' title=''/><author><name>Ponder Stibbons</name><uri>http://aeolist.wordpress.com</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.soulphysics.org/2010/02/get-started-reading-recent-classics-on.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9074529824943791718.post-5665507421133343876' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9074529824943791718/posts/default/5665507421133343876' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9074529824943791718.post-7393924941663368328</id><published>2010-02-10T13:40:33.936-05:00</published><updated>2010-02-10T13:40:33.936-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Also: "Time's Arrow and Archimedes' Point: New Dir...</title><content type='html'>Also: &amp;quot;Time&amp;#39;s Arrow and Archimedes&amp;#39; Point: New Directions for the Physics of Time&amp;quot; by Huw Price.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9074529824943791718/5665507421133343876/comments/default/7393924941663368328'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9074529824943791718/5665507421133343876/comments/default/7393924941663368328'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.soulphysics.org/2010/02/get-started-reading-recent-classics-on.html?showComment=1265827233936#c7393924941663368328' title=''/><author><name>Jon</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09594949524027204661</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.soulphysics.org/2010/02/get-started-reading-recent-classics-on.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9074529824943791718.post-5665507421133343876' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9074529824943791718/posts/default/5665507421133343876' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9074529824943791718.post-3771768776518588535</id><published>2010-02-10T13:38:53.993-05:00</published><updated>2010-02-10T13:38:53.993-05:00</updated><title type='text'>I'd suggest "Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Natu...</title><content type='html'>I&amp;#39;d suggest &amp;quot;Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized&amp;quot; if you&amp;#39;re interested in the more wide-ranging implications.  The authors argue (echoing a similar line that Maudlin takes in &amp;quot;Metaphysics in Physics&amp;quot;) that contemporary metaphysics is too-often informed by pseudo-naturalism.  Metaphysics is too often conducted, that is, by people who claim to be doing it in the name of real science, but who have only superficial understandings of out-dated scientific concepts.  If we want to make any serious progress in metaphysics, they contend, we need to drop the Humean supervenience-motivated appeals to atomic theory and Newtonian mechanics and engage with cutting-edge physics on its own terms.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9074529824943791718/5665507421133343876/comments/default/3771768776518588535'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9074529824943791718/5665507421133343876/comments/default/3771768776518588535'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.soulphysics.org/2010/02/get-started-reading-recent-classics-on.html?showComment=1265827133993#c3771768776518588535' title=''/><author><name>Jon</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09594949524027204661</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.soulphysics.org/2010/02/get-started-reading-recent-classics-on.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9074529824943791718.post-5665507421133343876' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9074529824943791718/posts/default/5665507421133343876' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9074529824943791718.post-7526780937979584411</id><published>2010-02-10T13:32:09.488-05:00</published><updated>2010-02-10T13:32:09.488-05:00</updated><title type='text'>I'd suggest maybe Peter Smith's "Explaining Chaos"...</title><content type='html'>I&amp;#39;d suggest maybe Peter Smith&amp;#39;s &amp;quot;Explaining Chaos&amp;quot; if only because the above list seems rather short on Chaos Theory. (That said, this is not a failing of the list, but rather a consequence of the lack of philosophical writing on chaos theory)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And while it&amp;#39;s not explicitly philosophy of physics, Gillies&amp;#39; Philosophical Theories of Probability is something everyone should be acquainted with.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9074529824943791718/5665507421133343876/comments/default/7526780937979584411'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9074529824943791718/5665507421133343876/comments/default/7526780937979584411'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.soulphysics.org/2010/02/get-started-reading-recent-classics-on.html?showComment=1265826729488#c7526780937979584411' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.soulphysics.org/2010/02/get-started-reading-recent-classics-on.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9074529824943791718.post-5665507421133343876' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9074529824943791718/posts/default/5665507421133343876' type='text/html'/></entry></feed>